Change Management in the Equalization of Supervisory Positions to Functional Positions in the Padang Lawas District Government

Munawir Baqi Daulay; Tunggul Sihombing; Asima Yanty S Siahaan

doi:10.55927/jsih.v4i3.538

Authors

Munawir Baqi Daulay Universitas Sumatera Utara
Tunggul Sihombing Universitas Sumatera Utara
Asima Yanty S Siahaan Universitas Sumatera Utara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55927/jsih.v4i3.538

Keywords:

Change Management, Job Equivalence, Functional Positions, ADKAR Model, Bureaucratic Reform

Abstract

This study aims to analyze change management in the alignment of supervisory positions to functional positions within the Padang Lawas Regency Government. The research employs Jeffrey M. Hiatt's ADKAR change management model to examine five dimensions following the alignment process, namely Awareness, Desire, Knowledge, Ability, and Reinforcement. A qualitative approach with a descriptive method was applied, using data collection techniques such as interviews, observation, and documentation. The data analysis followed the Miles, Huberman, and Saldana model, including data collection, condensation, presentation, and conclusion drawing. The results indicate that change management in the alignment of supervisory positions to functional positions across the five ADKAR dimensions shows varying levels of achievement. The Awareness dimension, related to understanding the rationale and urgency of the change, achieved a very high level, with most employees comprehending the policy's foundation. Similarly, the Ability dimension, reflecting employees' basic capability and competence in carrying out their new roles, was also at a good level. However, significant challenges remain in the other three dimensions. The Desire dimension, reflecting willingness to support and actively participate in the change, faced obstacles due to concerns about future career development patterns.

References

Coffman, Karen dan Lutes, Katie. (2007). Change Management: Getting User Buy-In. USA: Management of Change.

Dalimunthe, M. A., Ritonga, A. R., & Ananda, S. (2025). The Role of Opinion Leaders in Bullying Prevention: Evaluating the Roots Program in SMA Negeri 19 Medan Through the Lens of Two-Step Flow Communication Theory. Komunika, 21(01), 33-40.

Gaus, N., Sultan, S., & Basri, M. (2017). State Bureaucracy in Indonesia and its Reforms: An Overview. International Journal of Public Administration, 40(8), 658–669. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2016.1186179

Gibson. (1985). Organisasi, Perilaku, Struktur, proses. Jakarta: Erlangga

Greenberg, J. dan Baron, R.A. (2003). Behavior in Organitation. Edisi 8. New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River,

Klarner, P., Probst, G., & Saparnot, R. (2008). Organizational change capacity in public services: The case of the world health orgazational. Journal of Change Management, 8(1), 57-72

Marthalina, M. (2021). Analisis Dampak Pengembangan Karir PNS Pasca Pelaksanaan Alih Jabatan Struktural ke Jabatan Fungsional. Jurnal MSDA (Manajemen Sumber Daya Aparatur), 9(1), 42–55.https://doi.org/10.33701/jmsda.v9i1.1716

Miles, M.B, Huberman, A.M, & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis, A Methods Sourcebook, Edition 3. USA: Sage Publications. Terjemahan Tjetjep Rohindi Rohidi, UI-Press Mintzberg, Henry. 1993. Structure in Fives: Designing Effective Organization. New Jersey: Prentice Hall

Nauheimer, Holger. (2007). Change Management for One World: A Virtual Toolbook for Learning Organization in Development. Online: www.change-managementtoolbook.com

Owen, C. (2020). Participatory authoritarianism: From bureaucratic transformation to civic participation in Russia and China. Review of International Studies, 46(4), 415–434. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210520000248

Park, S., Lee, D. S., & Son, J. (2021). Regulatory reform in the era of new technological development: The role of organizational factors in the public sector. Regulation and Governance, 15(3), 894–908. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12339

Pots, Rebecca and Jeanne LaMarsh. (2004). Managing for success, London: Duncan baird Publishers

Rambe,R.F. AL. K., Ritonga, A.R., Dalimunthe,M.A. (2023). Komunikasi Publik Pemerintah Kota Medan Dalam Pengalihan Kewenangan Kebijakan Terkait UU No. 23 tahun 2014. KomunikA. 19(01), 39-44. https://doi.org/10.32734/komunika.v19i01.11411

Ritonga, A.R., Dalimunthe, M.A., Veronica, A., Ginting, & L. D. C. U (2023). The Effectiveness of Social Media As A Promotional Medium Of The University Of Sumatera Utara (USU) Library. Talenta Conference Series: Local Wisdom, Social, and Arts (LWSA) 6 (3), 16-20

Ritonga, A. R., Dalimunthe, M. A., & Januarini, E. (2024). Utilization Of Digital Media in Improving Student Literacy (Case Study at SDN 10 Rantau Selatan). CONTENT: Journal of Communication Studies, 2(02), 01-08.

Robbins, S. (2013). Organizational Behavior. New Jersey: Prentice Hall International.

Rusliandy. (2022). Analisis Kebijakan Penyederhanaan Birokrasi Pemerintah Daerah, Kolaborasi : Jurnal Administrasi Publik, Volume 8, Nomor 1

Sarker, A. E., & Zafarullah, H. M. (2020). Political Settlements and Bureaucratic Reforms: An Exploratory Analysis Focusing on Bangladesh. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 55(2), 235–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/002190961987158

Turner, M., Prasojo, E., Sumarwono, R. (2022). The Challenge of Reforming Big Bureaucrary in Indonesia". Policy Studies, Taylor & Francis Journal, Vol.43(2). doi:10.1080/01442872.2019.1708301

Wibowo. (2006).Manajemen Perubahan. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada

Winardi.J. (2005). Manajemen Perubahan. Cetakan kesatu. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.