Implementation of Teaching Factory in Indonesian Vocational High Schools: A Bibliometric and Systematic Literature Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55927/fjmr.v4i9.483Keywords:
Teaching Factory, Vocational High School, Bibliometric Analysis, Systematic Literature ReviewAbstract
This study affirms that Teaching Factory (Tefa) is a systemic educational innovation bridging vocational high school learning with industry needs. By embedding authentic production processes into curricula, Tefa supports national economic priorities and global TVET reform principles. Bibliometric analysis identified four clusters: resources and evaluation, competency- based education, operational implementation, and the education–industry–quality link. Publication growth since 2018 reflects strong policy momentum from initiatives such as SMK Revitalization. However, gaps remain in longitudinal employability studies, cost- effectiveness evaluations, and Industry 4.0 integration. Tefa’s success depends on teacher development, curriculum alignment, infrastructure readiness, and industry collaboration. With strategic scaling and continuous improvement, Tefa could serve as a benchmark for vocational education reform in Indonesia and other nations.
References
Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
Bahoo, S. (2020). Bibliometric analysis: A tool for mapping the state of the art. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, 69(8–9), 665–684. https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-05-2020-0062
Booth, A., Sutton, A., & Papaioannou, D. (2016). Systematic approaches to a successful literature review (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Directorate of Vocational Development. (2017). Panduan pelaksanaan teaching factory di SMK. Ministry of Education and Culture of the Republic of Indonesia.
Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
Gough, D., Oliver, S., & Thomas, J. (2017). An introduction to systematic reviews (2nd ed.).SAGE Publications.
Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x
Haddow, G. (2018). Bibliometric research in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(3), 555–570. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2017.1370449
Halizah, N., & Resource, M. (2024). Enhancing vocational education through industry collaboration: A case study of SMK partnerships. Indonesian Journal of Vocational Education, 6(1), 45–58.
Imran, M. (2023). Teacher competency challenges in implementing industry-linked vocational education. Journal of Technical and Vocational Education, 5(2), 112–126. https://doi.org/10.21009/jtve.052.04
Kitchenham, B. (2024). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering (Version 2.0). Keele University.
Kuswantoro, A. (2014). Teaching factory as a learning approach to improve student competency. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 4(1), 23–31. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v4i1.2548
Ministry of Education and Culture. (2011). Petunjuk teknis teaching factory di sekolah menengah kejuruan. Directorate General of Secondary Education.
Misbahudin, M., Sutrisno, S., & Yuliani, Y. (2022). Competency gap in vocational high school graduates: Challenges and solutions. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi dan Kejuruan, 28(3), 317–328. https://doi.org/10.21831/jptk.v28i3.46018
Moed, H. F. (2017). Applied evaluative informetrics. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3- 319-60522-7
Muslim, M., Syazali, M., & Purwanto, P. (2019). Teaching factory implementation in vocational schools to improve student competence. Journal of Technical Education and Training, 11(3), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.30880/jtet.2019.11.03.005
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., ... & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Paryono, & Quito, M. (2010). Developing a competency-based learning model for vocational high schools. SEAMEO VOCTECH Journal, 6(1), 1–9.
Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. Blackwell Publishing.
Puslitjakbud. (2019). Kajian evaluasi implementasi teaching factory pada SMK. Ministry of Education and Culture.
Rauner, F., & Maclean, R. (2021). Handbook of technical and vocational education and training research. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0450-0
Safarinah, S., Purwanto, P., & Muslim, M. (2022). Strengthening vocational education through teaching factory: Evidence from Indonesian SMKs. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 12(2), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v12i2.44352
Siagian, E. (2023). Labor market challenges for vocational school graduates in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Employment Studies, 8(1), 23–34.
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Susanti, E., & Arifin, M. (2020). Teacher roles in managing teaching factory-based learning. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi dan Kejuruan, 26(1), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.21831/jptk.v26i1.30275
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence‐ informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375
UNESCO. (2016). Strategy for technical and vocational education and training (TVET) (2016– 2021). UNESCO Publishing.
Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17723971
Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Maslina Siagian, Hantono Hantono, Ronald H Haloho, Dodi Arisandy, Aman Simaremare

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.





























