Enhancing Grammar Competence in TEIL: A Contextual and Meaningful Framework

Sukarno Sukarno

doi:10.55927/fjmr.v4i4.149

Authors

Sukarno Sukarno Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55927/fjmr.v4i4.149

Keywords:

Grammar, Contextual and Meaningful Learning, TEIL

Abstract

The shift from traditional English language instruction to a communicative approach in Indonesia has led to a perceived decline in the importance of grammar competence, particularly in the transition to teaching English as an international language (TEIL). Many educators prioritize communication skills over grammatical accuracy, resulting in students’ lack awareness of their grammatical errors. In response, this paper advocates for a contextual and meaningful framework for teaching grammar. This approach involves presenting input texts, analyzing language elements with a focus on grammar, engaging in discussions about grammar usage and patterns, creating new texts, conducting peer correction exercises, and discussing students' texts. By embedding grammar instruction within meaningful contexts, students can develop a deeper understanding and improve their overall language proficiency.

References

Adams, R. (2007). Do second language learners benefit from interacting with each other? In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 29–51). Oxford University Press.

Aghajani, M., & Zoghipour, M. (2018). The Comparative Effect of Online Self-Correction, Peer- correction, and Teacher Correction in Descriptive Writing Tasks on Intermediate EFL Learners’ Grammar Knowledge The Prospect of Mobile Assisted Language Learning (MALL). International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 7(3), 14. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.7n.3p.14

Alsagoff L, McKay S. L., Hu G, & Renandya W. A. (2012). Principles and practices for teaching English as an international language. Routledge.

Ambele, E. A., & Boonsuk, Y. (2021). Voices of learners in Thai ELT classrooms: A wake up call towards teaching English as a lingua franca. Asian Englishes, 23(2), 201–217. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13488678.2020

Anderson, J., Leech, T., & Durham, H. (2023). Patterns of power, grades 9-12: teaching grammar through reading and writingq. Routledge.

Angelovska, T. (2017). Beyond instructed L2 grammar acquisition: Theoretical insights and pedagogical considerations about the role of prior language knowledge. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 7(3), 397–417. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2017.7.3.3

Atmaca, H., & Gunday, R. (2017). Using Literary Texts to Teach Grammar in Foreign Language Classroom. Participatory Educational Research, 4(2), 127–133.

Baleghizadeh, S., & Rezaei, S. (2010). Pre-service teacher cognition on corrective feedback: A case study. Journal of Technology & Education, 4, 321–327.

Batstone, R. (1994). Grammar. Oxford University Press.

Benati, A. (2017). The role of input and output tasks in grammar instruction: Theoretical, empirical and pedagogical considerations. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 7(3), 377–396. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2017.7.3.2

Bhatt, R. M. (2001). World Englishes. Annual Review of Anthropology, 30(1), 527–550. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.30.1.527

Bitchener, J., & Storch, N. (2016). Written corrective feedback for L2 development. Multilingual Matters.

Bolander, B. (2019). World Englishes and Transnationalism. In The Cambridge Handbook of World Englishes (pp. 676–701). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108349406.029

Brandl, K. (1995). Strong and weak students’ preferences for error feedback options and responses. Modern Language Journal, 79, 194–211.

Broszkiewicz, A. (2011). The effect of focused communication tasks on instructed acquisition of English past counterfactual conditionals. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 335–363.

Byram, M. (1997). Teaching and Assessing Intercultural Communicative Competence. Multilingual Matters.

Canagarajah, S. (2005). Reclaiming the Local in Language Policy and Practice. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Chang, J. W., Lee, M. C., Wang, T. I., Su, C. Y., & Hsieh, T. C. (2012). Using grammar patterns to evaluate semantic similarity for short texts. 8th International Conference on Computing Technology and Information Management (NCM and ICNIT), 548–553.

Chiesa, M., & Szwedek, A. J. (2020). The Role of Context in Language Learning. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 13(2), 9–22.

Collier, M. (1996). The Language of Literature: On Grammar and Texture. In Ancient Egyptian Literature (pp. 531–553). BRILL. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004676718_031

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. . (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage.

Danylenko, O. (2020). Input- and output-based grammar instruction in teaching English after German. World Science, 3(6(58)), 11–17. https://doi.org/10.31435/rsglobal_ws/30062020/7116

DeKeyser, R. (2015). Skill acquisition theory. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp. 94–112).

Dornyei, Z., & Murphey, T. (2009). Group Dynamics in the Language Classroom. Cambridge University Press.

Ellis, R. (1999). Input-based Approaches to teaching grammar: a review of classroom-oriented research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 19, 64–80. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190599190044

Ellis, R. (2002). Methodological options in grammar teaching materials. In E. Hinke & S. Fotos (Eds.), New Perspectives on Grammar Teaching in Second Language Classrooms (pp. 155–179). Lawrence Erlbaum.

Ellis, R. (2003). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford University Press.

Ellis, R. (2006). Current Issues in the Teaching of Grammar: An SLA Perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 40(1), 83. https://doi.org/10.2307/40264512

Fotos, S. (2004). Context matters: Effects of the second language learning environment on second language lexical acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition2, 26(2), 227–241.

Galloway, N., & Rose, H. (2015). Introducing Global Englishes. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315734347

Gass, S., & Lewis, K. (2007). Perceptions of interactional feedback: Differences between heritage language learners and non-heritage language learners. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 79–99). Oxford University Press.

Graus, J., & Coppen, P.-A. (2016). Student teacher beliefs on grammar instruction. Language Teaching Research, 20(5), 571–599. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168815603237

Harmer, J. (2015). The practice of English language teaching (5th ed.). Pearson Education.

Hedjazi Moghari, M., & Marandi, S. S. (2017). Triumph through texting: Restoring learners’ interest in grammar. ReCALL, 29(3), 357–372. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344017000167

Heller, M. (1991). Reading-writing connections: From theory to practice. Longman.

Jacobs, G. M., & Goh, C. M. (2007). Cooperative Learning in the Language Classroom. Cambridge University Press.

Jenkins, J. (2000). English as a lingua franca. Oxford University Press.

Kubota, R. (2002). The impact of globalization on language teaching in Japan. In Globalization and Language Teaching (pp. 13–28). Routledge.

Lan, Y.-J., Sung, Y.-T., & Chang, K.-E. (2007). A mobile-device-supported peer- assisted learning system for collaborative early EFL reading. Language Learning & Technology. Language Learning & Technology, 11(3), 130–151.

Larsen-Freeman, D. (1995). On the teaching and learning of grammar: challenging the myths. In Second Language Acquisition Theory and Pedagogy. In F. R. Eckman, D. Highland, P. W. Lee, J. Milcham, & R. R. Weber (Eds.), Second Language Acquisition Theory and Pedagogy (pp. 131–150). Lawrence Erlbaum.

Larsen-Freeman, D. (2014). Teaching grammar. In M. Celce-Murcia, D. M. Brinton, & M. A. Snow (Eds.), Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language (4th ed., pp. 256–270). National Geographic Learning.

Larsen-Freeman, D., & Anderson, M. (2011). Techniques and principles in language teaching (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.

Lee Mckay, S. (2015). Teaching and Assessing EIL in Local Contexts Around the World. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315769097

Lee, S.-K., & Huang, H.-T. (2008). Visual input enhancement and grammar learning: a meta-analytic review. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30(3), 307–331. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263108080479

Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (2013). A Communicative Grammar of English. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315836041

Lin, C.-J., Hwang, G.-J., Fu, Q.-K., & Cao, Y.-H. (2020). Facilitating EFL students’ English grammar learning performance and behaviors: A contextual gaming approach. Computers & Education, 152, 103876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103876

Lodico, M. G. (2010). Methods in Educational Research: From Theory to Practice. Jossey-Bass.

Lutfulloyevna, K. S. (2023). Teaching grammar in context. International Journal of Social Science & Interdisciplinary Research, 8(36), 66–68. https://gejournal.net/index.php/IJSSIR/article/view/1761

Marlina, R. (2013). Learning about English as an international language in Australia from three students’ perspectives. Asian EFL Journal, 15(3), 201–228.

Marlina, R. (2014). The Pedagogy of English as an International Language (EIL): More Reflections and Dialogues (pp. 1–19). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06127-6_1

Matsuda, A. (2012). Principles and practices of teaching English as an international language. . Multilingual Matters.

Maulana, R., Smale-Jacobse, A., Helms-Lorenz, M., Chun, S., & Lee, O. (2020). Measuring differentiated instruction in The Netherlands and South Korea: factor structure equivalence, correlates, and complexity level. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 35(4), 881–909. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-019-00446-4

McKay, S. L., & Bokhorst-Heng, W. D. (2008). International English in Its Sociolinguistic Contexts: Towards a Socially Sensitive EIL Pedagogy. Routledge.

Nelson, C. L., Proshina, Z. G., & Davis, D. R. (Eds.). (2019). The Handbook of World Englishes. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119147282

Nosirova, D. (2023). Learning grammar through context: enhancing language proficiency. Modern Science and Research, 2(7), 349–351. https://inlibrary.uz/index.php/science-research/article/view/22235

Paikeday, T. (1985). The Native Speaker Is Dead! Paikeday.

Pawlak, M. (2013). Principles of instructed language learning revisited: Guidelines for effective grammar teaching in the foreign language classroom. In Droździał-Szelest & M. Pawlak (Eds.), Psycholinguistic and sociolinguistic perspectives on second language learning and teaching: Studies in honor of Waldemar Marton (pp. 199–220). Springer.

Pawlak, M. (2019). Tapping the distinction between explicit and implicit knowledge: Methodological issues. In Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk (Ed.), Contacts & contrasts in educational contexts and translation (pp. 45–60). Springer Nature.

Pawlak, M. (2021). Teaching foreign language grammar: New solutions, old problems. Foreign Language Annals, 5(4), 881–896. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12563

Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. Cambridge University Press.

Rickheit, G., & Strohner, H. (2008). A handbook of communication competence. Wakter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG.

Rutherford, W. (1987). Second Language Grammar: Teaching and Learning. Longman.

Sato, M. (2013). Beliefs about peer interaction and peer corrective feedback: Efficacy of classroom intervention. The Modern Language Journal, 97(3), 611–633. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2013.12035.x

Seidlhofer, B. (2011). Understanding English as a Lingua Franca. Oxford University Press.

Selvi, A., Galloway, N., & Rose, H. (2024). Teaching English as an International Language. Cambridge University Press.

Sharifian, F. (2009). English as an International Languages: perspectives and pedagogical issues. Multilingual Matters.

Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In Principles and practice in the study of language: Studies in honor of H.G. Widdowson (pp. 125–144). Oxford University Press.

Tammenga-Helmantel, M., Arends, E., & Canrinus, E. T. (2014). The effectiveness of deductive, inductive, implicit and incidental grammatical instruction in second language classrooms. System, 45, 198–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.06.003

Ur, P. (2011). Grammar teaching: research, theory, and practice. In Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning (pp. 507-5ne22). Routledge.

VanPatten, B. (1996). Input Processing and Grammar Instruction in Second Language Acquisition: Theory and Research. Ablex.

VanPatten, B., & Uludag, O. (2011). Transfer of training and processing instruction: From input to output. System, 39(1), 44–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2011.01.013

Vold, E. T. (2020). Meaningful and contextualised grammar instruction: what can foreign language textbooks offer? The Language Learning Journal, 48(2), 133–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2017.1357745

Winke, P. M. (2013). The effect of input enhancement on grammar learning and comprehension: A modified replication of Lee (2007) with eye-movement data. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35, 323–352.

Wood, C., Kemp, N., & Waldron, S. (2014). Exploring the longitudinal relationships between the use of grammar in text messaging and performance on grammatical tasks. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 32(4), 415–429.

Yunita, W. (2014). Out of class peer group discussion in learning basic English grammar and its impact on the students’ grammatical knowledge. Proceedings of ISELT FBS Universitas Negeri Padang, 469–474.

Zhou, C. (2018). Teaching model of college English grammar in intensive reading course. Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri, 18(6), 2617–2632. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0360-1315(20)30075-0/sref84