Digital Services Tax (DST) and Global Trade Conflicts: Balancing Fairness and Trade Relations

Authors

  • Putri Nur Aisyah Universitas Sriwijaya
  • Rina Tjandrakirana DP Universitas Sriwijaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55927/fjmr.v4i3.122

Keywords:

Digital Services Tax, International Taxation, Global Trade Policy, Multilateral Tax Reform

Abstract

This study examines the impact of the Digital Services Tax (DST) on global trade, tax fairness, and international tax reforms. Using a qualitative approach and a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) method, the research evaluates DST’s role in addressing tax base erosion while highlighting its economic and geopolitical implications. Findings reveal that DST increases government revenues, particularly in developing nations, but also exacerbates trade conflicts and legal uncertainties, deterring Foreign Direct Investment (FDI). While the OECD’s Pillars One and Two offer a multilateral alternative, their implementation remains complex and politically contested. The study concludes that achieving a sustainable digital tax system requires a balanced, cooperative framework to mitigate trade tensions and promote tax fairness.

References

Adda, M., Scandone, F. S., & Lorenzi, U. (2021). The New Taxing Right under Pillar One: Preliminary Thoughts on Potential Implications for MNEs. International Transfer Pricing Journal, 2021(1), 9–16. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85153098818&partnerID=40&md5=b2486bfe5ce892342bd36f2a0e2d8ae1

Ahmadova, S., & Rahman, A. (2024). Digitalization and its tax implications: Evidence from the uk and hungary. In Studies in Systems, Decision and Control (Vol. 525, pp. 511–520). Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54383-8_39

Álvarez Martínez, M. T., Gesualdo, M., & Pycroft, J. (2024). Storm in the Cloud: A Study on the Macroeconomic Impact of the UK’s Digital Service Tax. Economic Systems Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2024.2374767

Andenas, M., & Zleptnig, S. (2007). Proportionality and balancing in WTO law: a comparative perspective. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 20(1), 71–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557570701232233

Andrade, B. (2021). Developing Countries and the Proposed Article 12B of the UN Model: Some Known Unknowns. International Tax Studies, 2021(6), 1–23. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85173023504&partnerID=40&md5=11d413659a2ee7f28a32085f6c78839f

Arginelli, P., & Reboli, F. (2023). Pillar Two and Tax Competition: What is the Future of Tax Incentives? In F. E. & C. F. (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering: Vol. 342 LNCE (pp. 177–202). Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30879-6_14

Avi-Yonah, R., Kim, Y. R., & Sam, K. (2022). A New Framework for Digital Taxation. Harvard International Law Journal, 63(2), 279–341. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85160079982&partnerID=40&md5=e3a5add165dbbd5b5f5a098f39b44a48

Berger, A., & Polezharova, L. V. (2023). Tax on Digital Services: Assessment of the Advantage of the Introduction in Russia. Finance: Theory and Practice, 27(1), 54–62. https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2023-27-1-54-62

Bilaney, S. K., & Nori, S. (2024). Interplay between Pillar Two and Transfer Pricing Rules. International Transfer Pricing Journal, 31(3), 152–156. https://doi.org/10.59403/3y0sz3w

Bilotta, N. (2020). Beyond the Digital Tax: The Challenges of the EU’s Scramble for Technological Sovereignty. International Organisations Research Journal, 15(4), 30–47. https://doi.org/10.17323/1996-7845-2020-04-02

Bird, R. M., & Zolt, E. M. (2008). Technology and taxation in developing countries: From hand to mouse. National Tax Journal, 61(4 PART 2), 791–821. https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2008.4s.02

Borlini, L. (2023). Economic Interventionism and International Trade Law in the Covid Era. German Law Journal, 24(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2023.13

Boucoyannis, D. (2007). The international wanderings of a liberal idea, or why liberals can learn to stop worrying and love the balance of power. Perspectives on Politics, 5(4), 703–727. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592707072180

Brown, A. G., & Stern, R. M. (2009). Chapter 2 Issues of Fairness in Dispute Settlement. In J. C. Hartigan (Ed.), Trade Disputes and the Dispute Settlement Understanding of the WTO: An Interdisciplinary Assessment (Vol. 6, pp. 33–72). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1574-8715(2009)0000006005

Byun, S.-W. (2021). Interdependence, identity, and China–South Korea political relations: Asia’s paradox. Asian Survey, 61(3), 473–499. https://doi.org/10.1525/AS.2021.61.3.473

Çakmak, C., & Ustaoğlu, M. (2017). Politics vs. trade: a Realist view on Turkish‒Israeli economic relations. Israel Affairs, 23(2), 303–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/13537121.2016.1274506

Cao, B. M. (2023). The Chinese Perspective on International Tax Law. In The Oxford Handbook of: International Tax Law (pp. 821–840). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780192897688.013.48

Čerka, P., Grigienė, J., & Venslovaitytė, K. (2024). Tax Challenges Arising from Digitalization: Evaluating the Taxation Models Proposed by the European Commission and the OECD. Review of European and Comparative Law, 58(3), 99–116. https://doi.org/10.31743/recl.17376

Chaisse, J. (2023). Tax, trade, and investment conundrum in Asia-Pacific regionalism. Asia Pacific Law Review, 31(2), 535–555. https://doi.org/10.1080/10192557.2023.2216414

Chatagnier, J. T., & Kavaklı, K. C. (2017). From Economic Competition to Military Combat: Export Similarity and International Conflict. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 61(7), 1510–1536. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002715613565

Christensen, R. C., & Hearson, M. (2019). The new politics of global tax governance: taking stock a decade after the financial crisis. Review of International Political Economy, 26(5), 1068–1088. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2019.1625802

Colangelo, G. (2023). In Fairness We (Should Not) Trust. The Duplicity of the Eu Competition Policy Mantra in Digital Markets. SSRN Electronic Journal, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4360057

Conybeare, J. A. C. (2007). Efficiency, entitlements and deservingness: Perspectives on international distributive justice. Review of International Political Economy, 14(3), 389–411. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290701395668

Cugusi, I. (2020). Prospects for taxation of the digital economy between “tax law and new economy” and “tax law of the new economy.” World Tax Journal, 12(4), 763–797. https://doi.org/10.59403/3jq87rb

da Silva, B. (2020). Taxing Digital Economy: A Critical View Around the Globe (Pillar Two). Frontiers of Law in China, 15(2), 111–141. https://doi.org/10.3868/s050-009-020-0009-7

Dimitropoulou, C. (2019). The digital services tax and fundamental freedoms: Appraisal under the doctrine of measures having equivalent effect to quantitative restrictions. Intertax, 47(2), 201–218. https://doi.org/10.54648/taxi2019018

Donno, D., & Rudra, N. (2014). To fear or not to fear? BRICs and the developing world. International Studies Review, 16(3), 447–452. https://doi.org/10.1111/misr.12152

Elisabet, M., & Dewi, Y. K. (2021). Digital Services Tax Regulation and WTO Non-discrimination Principle: Is the Deck Stacked? Indonesian Journal of International Law, 19(1), 39–57. https://doi.org/10.17304/ijil.vol19.1.2

Garbarino, C. (2024). The OECD/G20 and the EU global minimum tax. In Research Handbook on Post-Pandemic EU Economic Governance and NGEU Law (pp. 282–297). Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035328161.00030

Gehrke, T. (2022). EU Open Strategic Autonomy and the Trappings of Geoeconomics. European Foreign Affairs Review, 27, 61–78. https://doi.org/10.54648/EERR2022012

Gopalakrishnan, B. N., Chakravarthy, S. L., Tewary, T., & Jain, V. (2022). Isolating China: Deglobalisation and its Impact on Global Value Chains. Foreign Trade Review, 57(4), 390–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/00157325211045463

Greggi, M. (2020). Rise and Decline of the Westphalian Principle in Taxation: The Web Tax Case. EC Tax Review, 6–21. http://www.kluwerlawonline.com/api/Product/CitationPDFURL?file=Journals%5CECTA%5CECTA2020002.pdf

Guan, C., & Xu, Q. (2021). The boundary of supranational rules: Revisiting policy space conflicts in global trade politics. Journal of World Trade, 55(5), 853–880. https://doi.org/10.54648/trad2021036

Guo, Y., Zou, T., & Shan, Z. (2022). Taxation strategies for the governance of digital business model—An example of China. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1013228

Heering, J., Crasnic, L., & Newman, A. (2024). When digital taxes come due: national digital taxes and the negotiation of the OECD inclusive framework. New Political Economy. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2024.2405524

Higgott, R. (2008). International political economy. In A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy (pp. 153–182). wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405177245.ch6

Hines, J. R. (2023). Digital Tax Arithmatic. National Tax Journal, 76(1), 119–143. https://doi.org/10.1086/723179

Huang, T., & Liao, L. (2024). The erosive effect of digital economy on tax revenue: empirical evidence from urban panels in China. Applied Economics Letters. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2024.2363321

James, A. (2012). Fairness in Practice: A Social Contract for a Global Economy. In Fairness in Practice: A Social Contract for a Global Economy. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199846153.001.0001

Juswanto, W., & Abiyunus, Y. F. (2022). Taxing the Digitalized Economy An Emerging Markets Perspective. In Taxation in the Digital Economy: New Models in Asia and the Pacific (pp. 56–81). Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003196020-5

Karacaovali, B. (2015). Varying Political Economy Weights of Protection: The Case of Colombia. Economics and Politics, 27(2), 290–312. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecpo.12057

Kayis-Kumar, A. N. N. (2019). The importance of lawyers in international tax policy design and development: An exploration and extension of the legal-economic literature. University of New South Wales Law Journal, 42(1), 269–299. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85066627509&partnerID=40&md5=e02db3e0e0d3789b6cc82e6666c131dd

Kaźmierczak, M. (2024). Five Years of Digital Services Taxes in Europe: What Have We Learned? Intertax, 52(10), 635–646. https://doi.org/10.54648/TAXI2024065

Kondratov, D. I. (2021). Internationalization of the Currencies of BRICS Countries. Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 91(1), 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1019331621010044

Lamensch, M. (2019). Digital Services Tax: A Critical Analysis and Comparison with the VAT System. European Taxation, 59(6). https://doi.org/10.59403/weqhhg

Li, J. (2021). The legal challenges of creating a global tax regime with the oecd pillar one blueprint. Bulletin for International Taxation, 75(2), 84–93. https://doi.org/10.59403/1a68ax

Downloads

Published

2025-03-26

Issue

Section

Articles