English as a Foreign Language (EFL) Students’ Speech Errors: Implications for English Language Teaching

Roniel Sanchez Fortuna

doi:10.55927/fjmr.v4i3.118

Authors

Roniel Sanchez Fortuna Ritsumeikan Asia Pacific University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55927/fjmr.v4i3.118

Keywords:

English as a Foreign Language (EFL), Japanese Students, Speech Production, Speech Errors, Error Correction

Abstract

This study identifies, categorizes, and analyzes speech errors committed by EFL students and explores their implications for English teaching. Data were collected through content analysis, following a qualitative descriptive design, and recorded via an audio recorder and a speech log over one month. The study revealed that speech errors were categorized into twelve types: anticipation, perseveration, substitution, metathesis (exchange), addition, blends, shift, omission (deletion), malapropism, spoonerism, sound-exchange errors, and native language interference errors. To improve students' speaking skills, English teachers may design lessons that enhance fluency and accuracy while encouraging EFL learners to develop self-repair strategies to minimize repeated errors. Additionally, they are encouraged to conduct further research on effective error correction strategies to improve teaching practices.

References

Aitchison, J. (2003). Words in the mind (3rd ed.). Blackwell Publishing.

Baars, B. J. (1992). Experimental slips and human error: Exploring the architecture of volition. Plenum Press.

Best, C. T., & Strange, W. (1992). Effects of phonological and phonetic factors on cross-language perception of approximants. Journal of Phonetics, 20(3), 305–330.

Bradlow, A. R., Pisoni, D. B., Akahane-Yamada, R., & Tohkura, Y. (1997). Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: IV. Some effects of perceptual learning on speech production. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 101(4), 2299–2310. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.418276.

Chan, K. Y., & Vitevitch, M. S. (2010). Network structure influences speech production. Cognitive Science, 34(4), 685–697. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01100.x.

Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. Mouton.

Clark, H. H., & Clark, E. V. (1977). Psychology and language. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82(6), 407–428. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.82.6.407.

Czaplicki, B. (2009). Non-teleological approaches to metathesis: Evidence from dialects of Polish. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, 45(3), 353–367. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10010-009-0020-8.

Davidson, D. (1986). A nice derangement of epitaphs. In E. Lepore (Ed.), Truth and interpretation: Perspectives on the philosophy of Donald Davidson (pp. 433–446). Blackwell Publishing.

Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93(3), 283–321. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.93.3.283.

Dell, G. S., & Reich, P. A. (1981). Stages in sentence production: An analysis of speech error data. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20(6), 611–629. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(81)90202-4.

Finley, S. (2017). Learning metathesis: Evidence for syllable structure constraints. Journal of Memory and Language, 92, 142–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2016.06.005.

Fossett, T., McNeil, M. R., Pratt, S. R., Tompkins, C. A., & Shuster, L. (2015). The effect of speaking rate on serial-order sound-level errors in normal healthy controls and persons with aphasia. Aphasiology, 30(1), 74–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2015.1063581.

Freud, S. (1901). The psychopathology of everyday life: Forgetting, slips of the tongue, bungled actions, superstitions and errors. London: Ernest Benn Limited.

Fromkin, V. A. (1971). The non-anomalous nature of anomalous utterances. Language, 47(1), 27–52.

Fromkin, V. A. (1973). Slips of the tongue. Scientific American, 229(6), 110–117.

Garrett, M. F. (1975). The analysis of sentence production. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 9, pp. 133–177). Academic Press.

Garrett, M. F. (1980). Levels of processing in sentence production. In B. Butterworth (Ed.), Language production: Vol. 1. Speech and talk (pp. 177–220). Academic Press.

Goldrick, M. (2011). Linking speech errors and generative phonological theory. Language and Linguistics Compass, 5(6), 397–412. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2011.00282.x.

Goto, H. (1971). Auditory perception by normal Japanese adults of the sounds "l" and "r." Neuropsychologia, 9(3), 317–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(71)90027-3.

Harley, T. A., & MacAndrew, S. B. G. (2001). Constraints upon word substitution speech errors. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30(4), 395–418.

Jespersen, O. (1904). Lehrbuch der Phonetik. Teubner.

Kafifah, N., & Aini, N. (2020). A comparative analysis of spoken error of students’ utterances. Pedagogy: Journal of English Language Teaching, 8(1), 64. https://doi.org/10.32332/pedagogy.v8i1.1926

Khansir, A. A. (2022). Error analysis and English syllabus. LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, 25(2), 626–638. https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v25i2.3547.

Komaromi, B., & Jerković, J. (2023). Revisiting error analysis: Exploring errors in the case of English for specific purposes. Nastava i Vaspitanje, 72(3), 369–386. https://doi.org/10.5937/nasvas2303461k.

Kristianti, T. (2024). The implications of written malapropism in ELT. Polyglot: Jurnal Ilmiah, 20(1), 151–169. https://doi.org/10.1966/pji.v20i1.7400.

Levelt, W. J. M. (1983). Monitoring and self-repair in speech. Cognition, 14(1), 41–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(83)90026-4.

Lively, S. E., Logan, J. S., & Pisoni, D. B. (1993). Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: II. The role of phonetic environment and talker variability in learning new perceptual categories. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 94(3), 1242–1255. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.408177.

Lott, D. (1983). Analysing and counteracting interference errors. ELT Journal, 37(3), 256–261.

Martin, A. (2004). The ‘katakana effect’ and teaching English in Japan. English Today, 20(1), 50–55. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078404001087.

Meringer, R., & Mayer, K. (1895). Versprechen und Verlesen: Eine psychologisch-linguistische Studie. Göschense Verlagsbuchhandlung.

Miyawaki, K., Jenkins, J. J., Strange, W., Verbrugge, R., Liberman, A. M., & Fujimura, O. (1975). An effect of linguistic experience: The discrimination of [r] and [l] by native speakers of Japanese and English. Perception & Psychophysics, 18(5), 331–340. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211209.

Mooney, K. (2022). Phonology cannot transpose: Evidence from Meto. Phonology, 39(2), 293–343. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675723000088.

Muftah, M., & Rafik-Galea, S. (2013). Error analysis of present simple tense in the interlanguage of adult Arab English language learners. English Language Teaching, 6(2), 146. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v6n2p146.

Nemoto, A. K. (2018). Getting ready for 2020: Changes and challenges for English education in public primary schools in Japan. The Language Teacher, 42(4), 9–13. Retrieved from https://jalt-publications.org/articles/24344-getting-ready-2020-changes-and-challenges-english-education-public-primary-schools.

Nooteboom, S., & Quené, H. (2008). Self-monitoring and feedback: A new attempt to find the main cause of lexical bias in phonological speech errors. Journal of Memory and Language, 58(3), 837–861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.05.003.

Nozari, N., & Dell, G. S. (2012). Feature migration in time: Reflection of selective attention on speech errors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(4), 1084–1090. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026933.

Okumura, S. (2017). Authentic teaching opportunities of English for primary students as a community of practice: A case of pre-service teacher education at a Japanese university. International Journal of English Language Teaching, 4(2), 20–26. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijelt.v4n2p20.

Oppenheim, G. M., & Dell, G. S. (2008). Inner speech slips exhibit lexical bias, but not the phonemic similarity effect. Cognition, 106(1), 528–537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.02.006.

Rangkuti, R., Bangun, D. N. B., Yusuf, M., & Albar, M. A. (2023). Speech errors performed by former American presidents in “60 minutes” interview: A comparative analysis. Studies in Media and Communication, 11(1), 60. https://doi.org/10.11114/smc.v11i1.5761.

Schriefers, H., Meyer, A. S., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1990). Exploring the time course of lexical access in language production: Picture–word interference studies. Journal of Memory and Language, 29(1), 86–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(90)90011-N.

Skiba, R. (1997). Code switching as a countenance of language interference. The Internet TESL Journal, 3(10). Retrieved from http://iteslj.org/Articles/Skiba-CodeSwitching.html.

Smith, D. J. (n.d.). Speech errors, speech production models, and speech pathology. Human Information Processing.

Spooner, W. A. (1901). Bishop Butler. Methuen.

Stampe, D. (1969, April). The acquisition of phonetic representation. In Proceedings from the annual meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 443–454). Chicago Linguistic Society.

Syukri, M. A. (2018). Slips of the tongue produced by Indonesian children in casual conversation. Proceedings of the International Conference on Language Phenomena in Multimodal Communication (KLUA 2018). https://doi.org/10.2991/klua-18.2018.48.

Yamada, R. A., & Tohkura, Y. (1992). The effects of experimental variables on the perception of American English /r/ and /l/ by Japanese listeners. Perception & Psychophysics, 52(3), 376–392. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206698.

Yang, L. (2013). Error analysis of Chinese verbs by Korean students. Language Planning, (33), 61–62.

Yule, G. (1996). The study of language. Cambridge University Press.