Implementation of Merit System in China’s Bureaucratic and Public Administration Sectors

Hu Caihua; Akhmad Saufi

doi:10.55927/ajabm.v4i1.88

Authors

Hu Caihua Universitas Mataram
Akhmad Saufi Universitas Mataram

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55927/ajabm.v4i1.88

Keywords:

Merit System, Bureaucratic, Public Administration

Abstract

The implementation of the merit system has played a crucial in China. Previous studies suggest that meritocratic principles enhance governance efficiency by prioritizing qualifications and performance over political affiliations. While many existing studies focus on the theoretical foundations of meritocracy or its implementation in Western contexts, this study specifically examines the merit system within China’s unique political and cultural framework. Employing a library research methodology, this study analyzes five academic journal articles sourced from reputable, indexed databases such as Google Scholar, Science Direct, and ResearchGate. The findings reveal how the merit system is implemented in China's bureaucratic and public administration sectors, as well as the challenges it faces. Despite being formally embedded in China's governance structure, the merit system encounters significant obstacles, particularly the influence of guanxi (personal networks). This study highlights the complexities of establishing a true meritocracy in China and underscores the necessity of structural reforms to promote a more transparent and equitable bureaucratic system.

References

Afrianto, R., & Prasojo, E. (2020). Analisis Proses Pengisian Jabatan Administrasi Berbasis Merit System di Kementerian Energi dan Sumber Daya Mineral. Jurnal Reformasi Administrasi: Jurnal Ilmiah untuk Mewujudkan Masyarakat Madani, 7(1), 17-28.

Bell, D. A. (2015). The China model: Political meritocracy and the limits of democracy. Princeton University Press.

Bozionelos, N., & Wang, L. (2007). An investigation on the attitudes of Chinese workers towards individually based performance-related reward systems. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18(2), 284-302.

Burns, J. P. (2010). Civil service reform in China. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 7(1), 1-25.

Chan, H. S., & Rosenbloom, D. H. (2010). Four challenges to accountability in contemporary public administration: Lessons from the United States and China. Administration & Society, 42(1_suppl), 11S-33S.

Krippendorf, K. (1985). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. In Sage Publication (Vol. 31, Issue 6). International Educational and Professional Publisher. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.31.3460

Li, C. (2016). Chinese Politics in the Xi Jinping Era: Reassessing Collective Leadership. Brookings Institution Press.

Li, H., & Gore, L. L. (2018). Merit-based patronage: Career incentives of local leading cadres in China. Journal of Contemporary China, 27(109), 85-102.

Liu, S., Zhao, D., & Xie, W. (2016). Chinese teachers’ attitudes toward performance pay: the cases of three schools. International Journal of Educational Management, 30(6), 791-808.

Ma, L., Tang, H., & Yan, B. (2015). Public Employees’ Perceived Promotion Channels in Local China: Merit‐based or Guanxi‐orientated? Australian Journal of Public Administration, 74(3), 283-297.

Margahana, H., & Sari, S. S. (2018). Analisis Promosi Jabatan Terhadap Produktivitas Kerja Karyawan Pada PT. FIF Belitang OKU Timur. Jurnal Aktual, 16(1), 1-6.

Salim Alimuddin, M., Sangkala, S., & Ahmad, B. (2024). Merit system in promotion of primary high leadership positions in Majene regency. Jurnal Mantik, 7(4), 2992-3000.

Supriatna, D. (2020). Analisis Penempatan Pegawai Berdasarkan Merit System Pada Badan Kepegawaian Pendidikan Dan Pelatihan Di Kabupaten Sumedang Provinsi Jawa Barat. Moderat: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pemerintahan, 6(3), 525-538.

Utama, F. A. (2016). Meritokrasi di berbagai negara di dunia (perbandingan konstitusi). Jurnal Kebijakan dan Manajemen PNS, 10(2 November).

Zhu, J., & Dowdle, M. (2020). Building governance in China: The logic of fragmented control. Cambridge University Pres.